Lowbush blueberries, Vaccinium angustifolium, modulate the functional potential of nutrient utilization and DNA maintenance mechanisms in the rat proximal colon microbiota

Authors

  • Alison Lacombe Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, The University of Maine, 5735 Hitchner Hall, Orono, ME 04469
  • Robert W. Li United States Department of Agriculture ARS, Beltsville, MD
  • Dorothy Klimis-Zacas Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, The University of Maine, 5735 Hitchner Hall, Orono, ME 04469
  • Aleksandra S. Kristo Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, The University of Maine, 5735 Hitchner Hall, Orono, ME 04469
  • Shravani Tadepalli Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, The University of Maine, 5735 Hitchner Hall, Orono, ME 04469
  • Emily Krauss Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, The University of Maine, 5735 Hitchner Hall, Orono, ME 04469
  • Ryan Young Department of Molecular and Biomedical Sciences, The University of Maine, Orono, ME, 04469
  • Vivian C. H. Wu Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, The University of Maine, 5735 Hitchner Hall, Orono, ME 04469

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31989/ffhd.v2i6.87

Abstract

Background: The core gut microbiota encodes for a metabolic capacity that often surpasses the metabolic potential of its host. Lowbush wild blueberries (LWB) are a rich source of bioactive compounds, and the gut microbiota is an important modulator of their activity. The objective of this research is to study the effect of a diet enriched with LWB on the gastrointestinal microbiota’s metabolic potential.

Methods: Nine three-week-old male Sprague Dawley rats were randomly assigned to two groups. The control group (N=4) was placed on the AIN93 diet, and the treatment group (N=5) was fed the same diet with 8% (w/w) LWB powder substituting for dextrose. The animals consumed the diets for six weeks, after which they were sacrificed. Functional profiles and metabolic potential of the colon microbiota in response to diet were analyzed using deep whole genome sequencing (WGS).

Results: Proteins predicted from WGS DNA sequences were assigned to 3,746 COG, 5,577 KEGG, and 4,474 Pfam families. Statistical comparisons of the protein-coding genes revealed significant changes in 25 Gene Ontology (GO), 186 KEGG, and 20 Pfam protein families representing 2.1%, 3.3%, and 0.02% of all hits identified, respectively. Overall, the combined inquires into these databases represented an emphasis on membrane trafficking, DNA regulation, modification and repair, and nutrient metabolism. Protein families that significantly increased by the enrichment of LWBs were involved with amino acid metabolism, 2,4-dienoyl-CoA reductase, metal ion binding, glutamate synthase, REDOX homeostasis, and aryl transferases. In contrast, protein families involved with integrase/recombinase, reverse transcriptase, and transposon/transposase were at a lower abundance.

Conclusions: The results from this study reflect the potential impact that LWBs have on the functional repertoire of bacterial communities in the proximal colon. The results demonstrate a higher potential for the metabolism of amino acids and a lower potential for horizontal integration of plasmids and lower phage/transposon activity in the LWB diet, suggesting that the genome at the time of sampling was more stable. This study helps unravel diverse mechanisms of microbial adaptation to LWBs in the diet of mammals and can provide guidance in optimizing functional diets.

Downloads

Published

2012-06-18

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 6 (2012): June 2012

Section

Research Articles

License

Any manuscripts or substantial parts of it, submitted to the journal must not be under consideration by or previously published in any other journal or citable form. Authors are required to ensure that no material submitted as part of a manuscript infringes existing copyrights or the rights of a third party. In submitting one's article in any form, the author has assigned the FFC publishing rights and has agreed to an automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher. This is so that the FFC may create print option journals, for example, at the FFC’s discretion. If the author wishes to distribute their works by means outside of the FFC, for example within their community, they will have to place a request. 

 

Correspondence concerning articles published in Functional Foods in Health and Disease is encouraged. While derivative works (adaptations, extensions on the current work, etc.) are allowed, distribution of the modified material is not allowed without permission from the FFC.